Spoilers!

Wait a moment ... that's not supposed to happen until the next episode!Some people live for them. Me, I won’t even be in the same room with them if it’s possible. They are spoilers — pieces of information regarding the plots of movies and television shows that will give you too much knowledge in advance of actually watching said movie or television show.

Like all knowledge, spoilers are neither good nor bad; they’re just there, with the potential to be used or abused as the holder sees fit. I like knowing as little as possible about whatever I’m about to see — I won’t even watch a trailer if I can help it — and I try to extend my readers that same courtesy in my reviews. I try not to mention anything that happens after the first reel of a film; it just doesn’t seem fair.

Sure, sometimes it’s unavoidable; the heist sequence of “Inception” doesn’t start until more than an hour into the picture, but that’s the meat of the movie. Still, I did my best to dance around the specifics.

Anyway, I’m mentioning this because the AV Club has just posted Zack Handlen’s excellent essay about what really constitutes a spoiler, and whether you agree with him or not, it’s a good read for this fine late-summer morning.

It’s also tied to the new season of “Mad Men”, so fans of that show may want to bear that in mind …

Previously on “Lost”

We're not leaving until someone explains the DHARMA shark… well, it’s all previously, isn’t it? And now, with the show’s sixth and final season arriving on disc, there’s no better time to mull it over once more and piss off everyone who thought the ending was weak. So check out my latest MSN DVD column … if you dare!

Ah, who am I kidding? You totally dare.

Also, saying “Desmond is the bomb” just confuses people after season five.

In a World Where Crap is King

This is why we can't have nice things, and by nice things I mean good moviesThe weekend box-office is in, and Sylvester Stallone’s ’80s shoot-em-up “The Expendables” remains in the number-one spot with a second-week gross of $16.5 million. And if you think the title of this blog post refers to that, well, you’re only half right.

See, the weekend’s number two movie — with $12.2 million in ticket sales — is “Vampires Suck”, the latest from hack parodists Josh Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, who’ve foisted “Date Movie”, “Epic Movie”, “Disaster Movie” and “Meet the Spartans” upon our screens over the past few years. Now, in fairness, I haven’t seen the new one, but I know the template, and I know Friedberg and Seltzer’s sense of pop-culture humour, which is roughly adjacent to Jay Leno’s.

It’s lowest-common-denominator stuff — bringing out a Britney Spears impersonator and smacking her with a mallet, because everyone wants to see Britney Spears get smacked in the face with a mallet. It’s the same impulse that led Jay Roach to throw Jeff Dunham into “Dinner for Schmucks” — a sop to the Middle Americans who might not recognize Jemaine Clement, Lucy Punch, Kristen Schaal or Chris O’Dowd but sure do love that ventriloquist guy. (And here I must pause and point out that for all his failings, Roach is a more astute director of comedians than Friedberg and Seltzer, who just hire lookalike actors and make them repeat the dialogue from whatever they’re mocking with one eyebrow raised.)

So, yeah. “Scott Pilgrim vs. the World” barely stays in the game, holding tenth place with a $5 million take, but “Vampires Suck” just made half its budget back, guaranteeing it’ll be profitable by the time it hits DVD (which should be presently). And Friedberg and Seltzer will have another insta-parody in theatres by Christmas — probably going after the “Harry Potter” series. That’s on you, moviegoers. Damn you all to hell.

Are You Sitting Comfortably? Then Let’s Begin

Magical, sure, but terrible with tweezersIt’s turned out to be one of those weeks where nearly everything coming out falls directly on my head. How swell. Fortunately, there’s a surprisingly wide range of stuff opening today, and most of it is even worthwhile!

George A. Romero’s Survival of the Dead“: He may be running on fumes these days, but people will still give him money to kill zombies, so here we are with a sixth chapter in the “Dead” series, featuring Kenneth Welsh in what may be the single worst performance in any Romero film ever. (And Romero worked with Richard France three times.)

The Infidel“: Omid Djalili plays an assimilated London Muslim who’s shocked to discover he was born Jewish in Josh Appignanesi’s cross-cultural farce, which doesn’t exactly break new ground comedically but does hit its marks reasonably well.

Lebanon“: Is Samuel Maoz’ subjective look at an Israeli tank crew on the first day of the Lebanon war an experimental war movie, or an experiential one? I’m not quite sure, but I know it makes for great cinema, and isn’t that all that matters?

Lottery Ticket“: Ice Cube continues to reinvent our notions of “wholesome family comedy” with this frenzied effort about a teenager (Bow Wow, no longer Li’l) who wins a massive jackpot but can’t collect it until the end of a long weekend. A very long weekend, as it turns out.

Nanny McPhee Returns“: Emma Thompson brings her magical governess back for another round of CG-enhanced kid-friendly fun. It’s not great cinema, but it works well enough while you’re watching it; my review should be up on the NOW site later today.

“Piranha 3D”: No advance screenings for Alexandre Aja’s souped-up remake of the Joe Dante classic. This either means it’s terrible, or the studio doesn’t know what to do with it. Given that the cast includes intriguingly ironic leading man Adam Scott and hardened aquatic survivor Richard Dreyfuss, I’m hoping for the latter.

The Switch“: Look, you can spin almost any subject matter for comedy — think of “The Producers”, or “There’s Something About Mary”, or “Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans”. But you have to know what you’re doing, and this movie — starring Jason Bateman as (literally) a jerkoff who sabotages his best friend’s pregnancy by substituting his own sperm for her chosen donor’s — decidedly does not.

There, that’s everything. Well, almost; there’s a four-hour Japanese movie called “Love Exposure” playing at the Japanese Cultural Centre tomorrow night, about which I am writing for today’s NOW Daily column. I’ll post a link as soon as it goes up (UPDATE: Linked!), but if you want the short version? I’ve never seen anything like it, and it is spectacularly crazy. So that’s good, right?

This is How We Do It

You're a movie star! You're a movie star!After last week’s frenzy of interviews, you’d think I’d take it easier this week … but nope, here I am in the latest issue of NOW talking to Omid Djalili, the British stand-up comic who stars as in “The Infidel”, and George A. Romero, whose most recent zombie film “Survival of the Dead” shambles into the Toronto Underground Cinema tomorrow for a weeklong run.

Film festival? What film festival? I’m having my own little film festival right now …

See, “Suck” Has a Dual Meaning Here

Ten bucks says this turns into a 'Glee' jokeToday in new releases: “Vampires Suck”, the latest insta-spoof from Jason Friedberg and Eric Seltzer, the marketing geniuses who gave us the undying classics “Date Movie”, “Epic Movie” and “Meet the Spartans”, and of whom, in a perfect world, we would speak no more.

The trouble is, their movies are cheap to produce and generally profitable, so Fox loses nothing by throwing ’em on the market. Although this time, things might be different: According to the Hollywood Reporter, a work print of the film has leaked online, where it’s been downloaded by approximately 100,000 users. If I’ve done the math right, that’s about two-thirds of the opening-weekend audience.

Poor Fox. First the Wolverine debacle, now this. It’s almost like someone in a position of access and power is trying to warn people about the low quality of these movies. I wonder why he or she didn’t leak “Knight & Day”, too.

Instead of “Gunless” …

That's right, Paul Gross ... come just a little closer ...This week’s MSN DVD column aims to direct my readers’ attention to three films that deserve to be discovered on disc: Kim Ji-woon’s “The Good, the Bad, the Weird”, Rob Stefaniuk’s “Suck” and Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant’s “Cemetery Junction”.

I reviewed “The Good, the Bad …” for NOW two weeks ago, and I wrote about “Suck” at length last year around TIFF time. “Cemetery Junction”, though, that’s all new, since it bypassed Canadian theatres entirely.

Pity Sony wasn’t willing to hold the DVD release back a few weeks; certainly they’d have been happy to have it at TIFF 2010, where Gervais is always welcome. Ah, well. Now you can see it at your convenience. That’s sort of a happy ending.

42

Truly, words to live byWell, here we are. Or more accurately, here I am. Early middle age, or the ultimate answer to Life, the Universe and Everything? I guess I have another 364 days to figure that out.

I do know that, empirically speaking, things are good. Even with another TIFF looming — my 21st as an accredited journalist, which means I have now been covering this thing for exactly half my life — everything’s chugging along.

Relationships are strong, work is solid (amazingly enough, both for this economy and my chosen field), and I’m in fine health except for the thinning hair and my stupid old-man diet. (Don’t ask.)

And, of course, Dexter is making things interesting in his own unique way. Wasn’t really expecting there’d be a new dog in the picture today, but as a decidedly un-great man once said, we’re gonna keep him.

So, yeah. Let’s see what happens next, shall we?

Shameless Pandering Wins the Day

There we are, boys. I've tunneled my way back to relevance!… or the weekend, actually. With an estimated $35 million gross, Sylvester Stallone’s dopey retro bloodbath “The Expendables” roid-raged its way to box-office prominence, cementing Stallone’s comeback and guaranteeing he’ll make more dour, preposterously violent action pictures in the years to come.

The Julia Roberts spiritual-journey drama “Eat Pray Love” took in $23.7 million. And Edgar Wright’s “Scott Pilgrim vs. the World”, which was easily the week’s best new movie, took in about $10.5 million, according to this firewalled Variety piece, which you can still sort of read if you tilt your screen just the right way and squint.

Ah, well. “Shaun of the Dead” and “Hot Fuzz” didn’t set the box-office on fire either, but they’re still “Shaun of the Dead” and “Hot Fuzz”. “Scott Pilgrim” will find its audience on disc, just you wait and see.

My other other gig.